FP&A evolution

Industry Insights from the FP&A Survey

In defining the evolution of FP&A in our survey, Defining the Evolution of FP&A: Benchmarks, Challenges & Opportunities, several industry-specific trends became evident. We compared these industry results with survey averages to understand how FP&A evolution is affected by industry.

In terms of FP&A analytical maturity, the Technology and Financial Services industry has a relatively higher concentration (23%) of leading or advanced FP&A evolution, compared with the overall average of 17%.

Similarly, companies in the Insurance industry are leading the way in regard to advanced cloud-based solutions. 33% of organizations in this industry have implemented advanced analytics software, which is consistent with industry-specific legislative requirements. As a result, 33% of Insurance companies find it somewhat easy to perform scenario analysis compared to the overall average of 9%.

In contrast, the Utilities industry lags behind Insurance, Technology and Financial Services in terms of FP&A analytics maturity. Utilities have the lowest adoption rates of predictive (14%) and prescriptive (14%) analytics among all the industries represented in our survey.

FP&A strategic decision making

When we examined the spectrum of FP&A evolution, we found that data analytics also play a key role in financial maturity. Often, this process requires a number of activities such as data collection, data validation, insight generation, and driving actions. However, many of these activities are low-value and do not influence strategic decision-making.

This is evident in the Pharmaceutical/Chemical and Healthcare industries where they are the most challenged relative to data access. Each of these industries also has a relatively high percentage of companies with data overload – 29% for Pharmaceutical/Chemical and 19% for Healthcare. Because of this data overload, thirty-five percent (35%) of Pharmaceutical/Chemical companies find it very difficult to perform scenario analysis, compared with the overall average of 21%.

In terms of justifying the value of FP&A within their organizations, 56% of Financial Services companies and 28% of Manufacturing companies find it hard to justify the ROI against shorter-term Sales & Marketing investments versus an overall average of 38%. Similarly, only 50% of Healthcare company respondents indicated that their CFOs understand the strategic value of FP&A.

In contrast to the lack of support for FP&A in the Manufacturing industry, thirty-two percent (32%) of Technology company respondents strongly agree that FP&A delivers high strategic value compared to the overall average of 19%.

To continue to support the evolution of FP&A in their respective industries, seventy-four percent (74%) of Manufacturing companies identified forecasting, planning, and budgeting as an area requiring additional investment to increase the strategic value delivered by FP&A, versus the overall average of 59%. Also, fifty-nine percent (59%) of Financial Services companies identified management reporting as an area requiring additional investment to increase the strategic value delivered by FP&A, versus the overall average of 41%.

To further understand FP&A evolution in your industry, watch the webinar.

Prophix

Your business is evolving. Your systems should evolve too. Achieve your goals more successfully with Prophix’s innovative Corporate Performance Management (CPM) software. Improve profitability and minimize risk when you automate repetitive tasks and focus on what matters. Budget, plan, consolidate and report automatically. Whether in the cloud or on-premise, Prophix supports your future with a platform that flexes to suit your strategic realities, today and tomorrow.

Download the Financial Foresight WhitepaperHow modern finance practitioners can see the future

Download the Prophix CPM Overview
CPM Overview

Sign up for our Newsletter

Archives